简介：卢卡斯（Maxime Taffanel）今年 22 岁，在当地的俱乐部踢足球，他和父母及17 岁的弟弟西奥（Pierre Prieur）住在一起。西奥喜欢男性，他平日小心的隐藏自己的性向，只向他的哥哥吐露了心声。一天晚上，西奥决定在当地旅馆与一位年长的男子幽会...

简介：Marie, an independent and militant sex worker who has never needed to rely on anyone, not even to raise her son. When the latter is thrown off his post-graduate cookery course, Marie is unable to make her peace with it. Dreaming of a greater future for him, she decides to sign him up for one of the best cookery schools in France, but her income won’t cover the tuition fees. She needs to find a solution, at all costs. Even if it means leaving France…

简介：肥胖、粗俗而不失善良的50多岁男人基曼（杰拉尔·德帕迪约 Gérard Depardieu 饰）住在母亲花园旁的房车里，平时打理菜园，和朋友们泡小酒吧，时而和年轻女友安妮特（索菲·吉耶曼 Gisèle Casadesus 饰）在小窝里浪漫温存，过着平静的生活。然而，他的内心却有着不为人知的脆弱和苦楚，母亲在不想要他的情况下怀上了他，从来不知道父亲是谁；老师因为他的愚笨嘲弄；哥们儿喜欢他却又常常嘲笑他。女友想要个孩子，他却因自卑一直不肯答应，导致两人关系紧张。　　有一天，基曼在公园里遇到了一边养着鸽子一边在大声读小说章节的玛格丽特（吉赛勒·卡扎德絮 Gisèle Casadesus 饰），他荒芜的脑袋里开始萌芽。知识渊博的玛格丽特是一个退休的农艺学家，几乎花了她一生的时间用来周游世界和阅读文学作品。从此，基曼把午后的时间交给了玛格丽特的阅读......

简介：大臣司马谋朝篡位刺杀老皇帝，贪图玩乐的王子也被下毒危在旦夕。神秘的张天师出现救走王子，忠心耿耿的将军高云飞也逃出皇宫。王子在张天师的指导下走上复国之路，高云飞也四处召集妖魔好汉作为寻找太子诛杀奸臣的帮手。最后在皇陵拉开了一场复国和复仇的终极之战……

简介：这是关于路易十四的历史宫廷片，身娇肉贵的男主角并没有放弃龙椅龙袍，转而奔向歌台舞榭投诚。十七世纪还没有芭蕾舞的存在一般舞蹈史，都把路易十四视作足尖舞的开路先锋，由他一手创办的皇家舞蹈学院，是现在巴黎歌剧院芭蕾舞团的前身，一六六一年起步跳到今时今日，号称历史最悠久的老字号。日理万机的一国之君，兼任舞男而有这么辉煌的成绩，简直是推翻一心二用必定没有好结果谬论的典范。被安排与第N代徒孙比利。伊略特平起平坐，无论如何都算委屈。何况，当时在大庭广众表演举手投足特技是贵族玩意，就算带着性别歧视成份，也还未为参与者构成心理负担。比利。伊略特如果生在那个时代，大概不会经历可以搬上银幕的曲折故事。其实也不算太曲折，三言两语就说得清楚：出身矿工家庭的他，居然不顾传统社会的压力，立志当不为世俗所容的芭蕾舞男。父亲送他去社区中心学拳术，他在擂台上哈欠连连，反而隔壁的初级舞蹈班令他眉飞色舞。于是侧侧身一句“请让一让”，弃拳从舞擂台变成“蕾”台。父亲获知真相，气得面红耳赤说不出话来。儿子逼问：“学跳舞有什么不好？”他气急败坏答：“你知道为什么。”打死不肯招供。最后由儿子揭开谜底，硬要老父面对现实：“因为你觉得跳舞是女人的事，是同性恋所为！”

简介：伊莎贝尔·于佩斯饰演的安娜，一家四口从城市逃难到乡下，发觉自己的村屋给人占去。争执中丈夫被杀，安娜带着子女流离失所，途中儿子还给一流浪少年扣留。后来到了一个火车站，很多人在苦候，望火车把他们带到安乐郷。安娜听说有一班宗教义士，奉献自己以拯救人类，连她儿子也甘愿受祭。人在极端环境里不见得只剩下狼性。汉尼卡的风格有份严峻之美，正为杜绝滥情，从人之不仁中发现希望。

简介：Une histoire d'amour en prison, entre le directeur de prison et la détenue...

简介：巴黎，下午五至七时。美丽的女歌手克莱奥（柯琳妮·玛钱德 Corinne Marchand饰）正游荡在巴黎街头。她一袭黑衣，摘掉假发，面无声色地穿越着内心中的恐惧与焦灼。一切都由一份体检报告引发，她担心自己会如占卜的人所言，患上胃癌。忐忑不安的克莱奥游走在巴黎街头、咖啡厅、或是家里，遇到了各类形形色色的男人，她的情人或是朋友，对他们诉说她生命中的每一个段落，但似乎没人真正理解她。直到最后，她遇见了即将远赴阿尔及利亚战场的年轻士兵。在与他的交谈下，克莱奥开始重新看到了世界，坦然地面对现实。　　由法国女导演阿涅斯·瓦尔达执导的成名作《五至七时的奇奥》，是新浪潮电影中一部举足轻重的作品。本片入围1962年第15届戛纳电影节金棕榈奖。

简介：愛麗絲與瑟琳住在緊密相連的房子裡。她們是好朋友，而同為八歲的兒子戴歐和瑪星，也常常玩在一起。瑟琳的兒子瑪星不幸從臥室的窗戶墜落身亡，愛麗絲雖在現場卻無法救他。悲傷的瑟琳責怪愛麗絲沒有救她的兒子，她們的友情也逐漸決裂。瑟琳變得越來越鬼祟，愛麗絲擔心她有可能會對自己的兒子戴歐進行報復…

简介：安德烈（雅克·迪特隆 Jacques Dutronc 饰）和妻子丽斯贝斯带着儿子吉列姆（Rodolphe Pauly 饰）前往巴黎，因为经济拮据，一家人暂时住在好友米卡（伊莎贝尔·于佩尔 Isabelle Huppert 饰）家中，米卡热情的接纳了三人。某日，丽斯贝斯驱车参加晚会，途中遭遇车祸不幸身亡，而法医鉴定出车祸当晚，丽斯贝斯服用了大量安眠药，这一结果成为了笼罩在吉列姆心头的阴影，因为他怀疑母亲的死并非一场意外。　　一晃眼多年过去，安德烈成为了名扬四海的著名钢琴家，而米卡亦变成了吉列姆的后妈。某日，名为让娜（安娜·莫格拉莉丝 Anna Mouglalis 饰）的少女找到了安德烈，向他拜师学艺。实际上，让娜一直怀疑自己是安德烈失散多年的女儿。

简介：本片是“安托万系列”的最后一部，特吕弗有选择地插放了安托万（让-皮埃尔·李奥 Jean-Pierre Léaud 饰）一路成长的点滴。安托万三十而立时，职业上，成功进入一家印刷厂，成为一名作家，出版了自传体小说；婚姻上，与克里斯汀（克劳迪·贾德 Claude Jade 饰 ）的缘分走到尽头，但两人离婚后亦是朋友，在两人办完离婚手续，共同回忆过去一幕幕的甜蜜往事时，仍会心生美滋滋。　　影片也以插叙的形式重现了安托万以往的生活。他与科莱特意外地重新相遇，科莱特此时已经成为一个律师。两人都又遇到了令他们怦然心动的人，而为了留住缘分，也都花费了一番很大的心思。

简介：节目主持人吉恩在斯坦福大学的儿子亚当（22岁）回到法国巴黎，亚当与吉恩的下属有旧情。亚当去母亲家，见到其文学教授男友、男友女儿米拉（17岁）。亚当带着米拉出去玩，两人酒后后发生关系。第二天早上，米拉提起强奸控诉，亚当一开始否认性交但承认口交。庭审交锋激烈，证人各抒己见，最后亚当被判有期徒刑五年缓刑。

简介：阿贝尔是个性格谨小慎微的单身男子，他妈妈则性格与之相反，热情奔放又浪漫至极。阿贝尔的妈妈爱上了一个刚出狱的魅力老男人米歇。米歇动用谜之关系帮阿贝尔妈妈开了梦想中的花店。阿贝尔感到这背后定有隐情。阿贝尔暗恋着自己的同事兼好朋友克莱门。喜欢冒险的克莱门跟阿贝尔一起暗中调查西尔维，果然发现各种可疑线索……克莱门追求刺激渐渐沉迷其中，阿贝尔为了心上人不得不铤而走险，平淡人生从此翻天覆地。

简介：

简介：短片

简介：Two children go behind the scenes of a small circus.

简介：

简介：一位老者拥有在马赛附近小海湾上的一座别墅。他的三个孩子在他弥留之际回到他身边陪伴他:安吉拉是一位演员，现住在巴黎;约瑟夫爱上了一个只有他年龄一半的女人;阿曼德是唯一留在马赛经营家族小餐馆的孩子。他们是时候该好好考虑如何继承父亲的理想，以及他在这片神奇的土地上创造的社区精神。但是，在附近海湾突然出现的一群船民让他们把这一切都抛之脑后。

简介：Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�　　Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept　　Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

简介：Abel Davos在所有警察的追捕下，从意大利米兰流窜到法国尼斯。与一名陌生小伙子Eric Starck同谋合作，他重新回到巴黎，为的是解决债务……一部震惊的作品，充满了紧张悬念气氛。由乔斯.乔凡尼根据自己的小说改编，是法国警匪电影中最出色的经典之一。

简介：侯麦著名系列作品“四季的故事”之一。菲利茜（夏洛特·海瑞 Charlotte Véry饰）和查理（费德瑞克·范丹狄德夏 Frédéric van den Driessche饰）在海边浪漫相恋之后，因为一时不留神留下了写错的地址，而导致了二人再也找不到彼此。菲利茜生下了查理的孩子，但5年来却再也没有查理的音讯。　　生活还在继续，菲利茜遇上了喜欢她的一些男子，他们也不失为好男人，足够爱自己。比如成熟体贴的马桑（迈克尔·瓦雷蒂 Michael Voletti饰）和才华横溢的路易（Hervé Furic饰）。然而，在菲利茜的心中，查理却仍旧是个挥之不去的至爱之人。她不是不爱他们，只是无法爱到能和他们一起生活。她和路易一起看莎士比亚的歌剧《冬天的故事》，为里面的人物悄然落泪，也许她和剧中人一样，也在坚守着一个信念。　　终于某个冬天，菲利茜和查理竟然在公车上重遇，执着的梦想等来了实现的一天。

简介：侯麦著名系列作品“四季的故事”之一。菲利茜（夏洛特·海瑞 Charlotte Véry饰）和查理（费德瑞克·范丹狄德夏 Frédéric van den Driessche饰）在海边浪漫相恋之后，因为一时不留神留下了写错的地址，而导致了二人再也找不到彼此。菲利茜生下了查理的孩子，但5年来却再也没有查理的音讯。　　生活还在继续，菲利茜遇上了喜欢她的一些男子，他们也不失为好男人，足够爱自己。比如成熟体贴的马桑（迈克尔·瓦雷蒂 Michael Voletti饰）和才华横溢的路易（Hervé Furic饰）。然而，在菲利茜的心中，查理却仍旧是个挥之不去的至爱之人。她不是不爱他们，只是无法爱到能和他们一起生活。她和路易一起看莎士比亚的歌剧《冬天的故事》，为里面的人物悄然落泪，也许她和剧中人一样，也在坚守着一个信念。　　终于某个冬天，菲利茜和查理竟然在公车上重遇，执着的梦想等来了实现的一天。

简介：在艺术之都的巴黎，几个穷困潦倒的艺术家住在低档住宅区，他们分別是來自阿爾巴尼亞的油畫家、愛爾蘭的作曲家及一個法國劇作家，他们因缘聚合，虽然生活窘迫、境况艰难却一直坚持创作，渴望有朝一日被社会认同，虽然如此，他们依旧乐观生活，渴望爱情，他们互相帮助，顽强努力。机会终于向他们招手，而外省女孩咪咪的出现让他们三人的发生了微妙的变化，画家爱上了她，不久，画家因为非法入境而被驱逐，好事多磨，在好朋友们帮助下他又回到了巴黎当自由艺术家，他不仅事业有了转机也赢得了咪咪的爱情，好景不长，他们的杂志社倒闭了，三人回到了原地，更悲惨的命运等待着他们….。　　－－－－kavkalu

简介：Sam, journaliste indépendant, profite de sa culture musulmane pour infiltrer les milieux intégristes de la banlieue parisienne. Il se rapproche d’un groupe de quatre jeunes qui ont reçu pour mission de créer une cellule djihadiste et semer le chaos au cœur de Paris.